The Price of Standing Still

By Melissa Moschitto

Marianne went out for a walk in a smart men’s suit of houndstooth print, so they arrested her. A woman must not look too masculine, too modern, too severe. The arrest was meant to deter us, but it only tantalized. It was 1850 and there were those of us who wanted to wrench ourselves free of the corset and hoop skirt, those of us who were tired of being constrained by clothing and opinion. We had started wearing bloomers under our skirts. We merely wanted to ride bicycles without getting caught in the spokes, we said. Hemlines were raised by an inch or two. Half man, half woman! the men cried out after us in the streets, to those of us who dared to wear pantaloons. With our legs wrapped in voluminous fabric, we were indecent. You belong to neither sex! the men in the streets accused and they invented new names for us: inverts, she-males, hybrid species, public women.

A woman wandering in public without a predetermined path was not permitted. A woman wandering the streets was immoral. We were tired of the crunch of the corset, the sweat under the stays, the breath trapped in the chest, the permanent choke. At covert meetings, some of us used dolls to demonstrate how to wear modern underwear, helping women dress for freedom. “We must own ourselves under the law first,” said Frances Gage, and we believed her. We invented new names for ourselves: suffragists and women’s rights activists. Even if some of us weren’t brave enough to use those names, the fire had been lit.

It was 1872 and a woman had run for president. Ms. Victoria Woodhull’s defeat was bitterly recounted. Although some women insisted on forgetting, her loss followed us like vinegar. Most men laughed it off while dusting their hands on pant knees; they were privately worried, but publicly cavalier. They reminded themselves, relieved, that women could not vote. 

It was 1874 and a woman took off on foot from Kansas City straight through to Sacramento, California, looking for her husband. With no other income but his, she was tracking him down, an act of pure need. Why not take the railroad, it being naturally faster? asked the reporters. I’m not stupid, she replied. Being cornered into the back seat of a car, a mouth smothered with a hand smelling of tobacco—those things happened on a train. We understood. Mrs. Elizabeth Cady Stanton asserted that if women wore trousers, that would surely thwart criminal attacks. Let us walk, we insisted.

We were determined to be freed from the drawing room and the kitchen, the nursery and the wash. If we could not move with leisure, perhaps we could move as sport? A new breed emerged: the pedestrienne! Women started walking competitively around sawdust rings in stadiums. A track was the perfect solution: an endless loop to contain a woman! But we knew better. To walk on a track unencumbered by our daily burdens was not boring nor repetitive; rather, without insistent voices interrupting us with mundane queries, our thoughts belonged to ourselves. When it was suggested that we could not handle the physical toll of such exertion, we politely reminded them that we were well-accustomed to lugging baskets of food and buckets of water, balancing packages and carrying children, all against the constant ricochet of the hoop skirt. In fact, we had already walked the equivalent of Earth to Moon. 

It was 1875 and Mademoiselle Lola arrived in New York City, sleek as a cat. Twisting across the sky, the trapeze artist dropped to the ground to walk in P.T. Barnum’s grand Roman Hippodrome. Under its vast tented ceiling and before rows upon rows of seats, Mademoiselle Lola was to race a man. Stretching by the side of the sawdust ring in blue breeches that cut off at the knee, her calves encased in blue striped stockings, she was quite aware of all the eyes set upon her. She nodded to us in her saucy little cap and flicked a riding whip as she prepared to compete. We smiled back, astonished and enamored. We imagined ourselves to be so confident. Despite starting thirty-one minutes after Mr. William E. Harding, it was Lola who crossed the finish line first. 

It was 1876 and Chicago was the first city brave enough to host a six-day walking competition for women. Bertha Von Hillern and Mary Marshall were going to compete for a prize of five hundred dollars—more than a year’s salary. Now that was something worth walking for. The race was held at the Second Regiment Armory Building around an oval ten laps to the mile. Tickets were set at twenty-five cents. Organizers kept the price low, to ensure that the public would not be twice scandalized—once by the cost and again by the shock of women walking. But everyone from lawyers to mechanics were buying tickets. And everyone was placing bets. On January 31st, the petticoated pedestrians were off, kicking up sawdust as spectators gasped and gagged. By day two, blisters had appeared and the two women were numb from the cold. On Day three, the papers reported their breakfasts to breathless readers: rare steak, raw eggs, freshly squeezed lemon juice. On day four, with only twelve hours to go, the crowds grew to fill all three thousand seats, engulfing the stadium with a deafening roar. Endurance made it exciting and what else do women possess but endurance! Bertha and Mary vaulted ahead of each other, one mile at a time, looping in and out of ties. The crowds elbowed each other for a view, the police struggled to keep spectators off the track. After one hundred and thirty-two hours, Mary Marshall, in her costume of red, white, and blue, had won. 

Several newspapers asserted that as soon as women were permitted to walk, the next thing we’d do was try to vote, a prediction which only made us walk faster. New York City considered an ordinance banning women walkers outright, lest we would have walked from the ring all the way to the ballot box. It failed. Sadie, Theresa, Flora and Ellen signed up straightaway, walking in Toledo, Cincinnati, Detroit, and Milwaukee. Let them watch us, we thought, our feet pounding the dirt track, raising dust and hell. 

It was 1879 and twenty-year old Exilda La Chapelle went to Madison Square Garden determined to win. At thirteen, she had begun her career as nighttime entertainment, sauntering through taverns and theaters. At fifteen, she took the only other choice available to her: marriage. By seventeen she was a mother; a year later was bereft, her son having died in infancy. All this she endured. But at the garden, after two hundred and seven miles, she suddenly stopped. It was not the pain that stilled her, nor the exhaustion, nor even the blisters on her feet which needed to be lanced and drained. What she could not abide was her husband, drunk in the stands and flirting with women spectators. What she could not abide were the insults, slurs, and abuse that he shouted. How much was a woman supposed to endure? 

It was 1895 and we were going to walk right into the next century and get things started. The hard leather of our shoes cut into our feet, but we walked anyway. Anything to feel like we were going forward, progressing instead of retreating. Police commissioner Theodore Roosevelt permitted a woman to ride on horseback in Central Park! This must be proof, we thought, that something more was available to us.

It was 1912 and we left the sawdust circles to march up Fifth Avenue in white dresses, as if going to a picnic. Ten thousand of us had taken to the streets, demanding the vote. At the front was Mabel Lee astride a sinewy white horse. Mabel, who had moved from China to Chinatown at age nine, where she bloomed. Now at sixteen she wore the white stripe of the Suffragist sash, emblazoned with “Votes for Women!” Later that year, in the chill of autumn, we marched at night so that we could walk with the factory girls, maids and messengers, the working girls and tax-paying women. Linking arms, we lifted five thousand paper lanterns to dispel the darkness, fueling our steps with the insults, slurs, and abuse shouted from the sidelines.

It was 1917 and Fifth Avenue was filled only with the sound of feet on pavement, the sound of a slow-moving current of Black men and women walking in silence, bearing banners against brutality. Ten thousand heartbeats pounding against lynching. 

It was 1920 and the newspapers were ablaze: the vote for women had been won! Not for all, but many. Imperfectly, we sought to unbind ourselves.

It was 1956 and in the early September sun, Sallie Edwards and Esther Wise and Lurline White dabbed the sweat from their foreheads with handkerchiefs. In nicely pressed skirts that came to the knee, they held their signs high, urging their brothers and sisters to Please, register to vote! Sallie and Esther and Lurline were well aware of which eyes would be on them. By not moving, by standing still, they spoke volumes.

It was 1972 and a woman had again run for president. Shirley Chisholm fought to unbind herself from womanhood’s expectations, only to be betrayed by those who claimed the same. Her loss hit us, sour and sharp like vinegar. 

It was the end of the 20th century; we were elasticized and allowed to stretch. We held meetings, sitting in secret circles disguised as Tupperware parties and knitting clubs, schemes to set us free. We were thinking of what it would mean to own our own selves. But the old laws still corseted us to the past.

It is the 21st century and women are running their races across the nation, attired in menswear. They have tired of hearing that they should not appear too masculine, too modern, too severe. We join them in the streets, unconstrained and righteous, and when they lose, can you blame us for our fury? And when the century turns one quarter old, it is as if the track underneath us has turned from sawdust to quicksand. We are in a perpetual loop, yet we keep walking, keep enduring—anything to keep moving, forward.



Melissa Moschitto (she/her) is a fiction writer and an investigative theatre maker, lifting up feminist narratives to catalyze conversation and change. Her fiction has appeared in Bright Flash Literary Review, Macrame Literary Journal, and The Avalon Literary Review. She is the author of two published plays: Artemisia’s Intent and Give Us Bread. The mother of two dramatic children, she resides with her family in New York City. Visit her website at www.melissamoschitto.com.

Photograph of Lurline White, Sallie Edwards, Lulu Carter, Illa Buckner, Beulah Staton, Eddye Keaton Williams, Margaret Buford, Cathryn Williams, Esther Wise, Dola Miller II, and Frances M. Albrier of the San Francisco Chapter of the National Council of Negro Women, 1956, courtesy of The Smithsonian.


A note from Writers Resist
Thank you for reading! If you appreciate creative resistance and would like to support it, you can make a small, medium or large donation to Writers Resist on our Give a Sawbuck page.

Judged

By Sheree Shatsky

Artist Statement

This collage reflects the connection of women past with women present and future, faced with the loss of civil rights fought for and won by previous generations. We must stand on the shoulders of those who came before, who struggled for the rights we have very much taken for granted and presently find under assault.

This hand-cut paper collage is assembled using images gathered and photocopied from the public domain, as well as photographs from the artist’s personal collection.


Sheree Shatsky is the author of the novella-in-flash Summer 1969 (Ad Hoc Fiction 2023). Her collage “Overturn Citizens United” is included in Maintenant 18: A Journal of Contemporary Dada Writing & Art PLUTOCRAZY (Three Rooms Press 2024). Find her website, Substack and other links at linktr.ee/shereeshatsky.


A note from Writers Resist

Thank you for reading! If you appreciate creative resistance and would like to support it, you can make a small, medium or large donation to Writers Resist from our Give a Sawbuck page.

Miss Suzie Had a Baby, She Named Him Tiny Tim

By Laura Grace Weldon

 

Outrage drives me outside,
a choice a woman can still make.
I clamber close to our muddy creek
collecting trash caught in fallen branches.
I empty water from a Stroh’s bottle
and battered jug of Cheer detergent.
Pull out blue plastic bags and
an honest-to-God wire hanger.
Untangle a multicolored jump rope
with red wooden handles,
the kind we jumped with during
recess at Pine Elementary School
chanting K.I.S.S.I.N.G., and Cinderella.
Some girls were such good skippers
they didn’t miss a jump till a whistle’s
shrill made us head back in,
line up at the drinking fountain, then
sit every minute of three more hours.
I hear singsong rhymes in my mind
as I walk back with this trash
still feeling our legs leap,
our hair fly in synch,
drumbeat of feet on the ground
the way girls and women
from the beginning
have worked together
while singing in unison.

 


Laura Grace Weldon lives in a township too tiny for traffic lights where she works as a book editor, teaches writing workshops, and maxes out her library card. Laura served as Ohio’s 2019 Poet of the Year and is the author of four books. lauragraceweldon.com

Photo credit: ErstwhileHuman via a Creative Commons license.


A note from Writers Resist

Thank you for reading! If you appreciate creative resistance and would like to support it, you can make a small, medium or large donation to Writers Resist from our Give a Sawbuck page.

 

Throwaway

By Karen Kilcup

Who would want to live in a world which is just not quite fatal?  –Rachel Carson

 

A one-woman Revolution,
Jemima Wilkinson was stoned
for preaching the light that lives
in everyone. The Public Universal Friend
was driven north from Philadelphia
to the Finger Lakes, her movement forecasting
what would follow: women’s rights,
abolition, the Underground Railroad.

Today the monstrous trucks lumber north
with New York City’s trash, creating
a mountain baptized Seneca Meadows,
leaving a trail of sludge and garbage that leaches
slowly into the lakes, their stretched-out
digits trying to grasp what it all means,
will mean, in a moment when land and water
and history are for sale by the Town Council,
which spews the gospel of lower taxes
and buries ever deeper the women
of Seneca Falls, Seneca Lake,
and the sparkling railroad that carried
so many to fresh futures.

In this place, this time, what does clean mean?
What—or who—is dirty? Will we push
the plastic and the people underground
for good, or will the glacial hands
that hold the Haudenosaunee
send the refuse down, down,
until it returns elsewhere
in poisoned protest?

 


Poet’s note: A Quaker known by many as the Public Universal Friend, Jemima Wilkinson fled the ostensibly liberal city of Philadelphia shortly after the American Revolution, joined by devout followers who saw her as a spiritual guide. Susan Brind Morrow’s story in The Nation, “The Finger Lakes Are Being Poisoned,” ironically parallels Wilkinson’s flight to the appalling movement of diesel trucks that carry New York’s waste to the formerly pristine region that is home to centuries of Iroquois (Haudenosaunee) people, as well as to some of America’s most important movements for social justice advanced by Native Americans, women, and enslaved people—all historically considered subhuman and “dirty.”


A teacher and writer for more than forty years, Karen Kilcup is the Elizabeth Rosenthal Professor of American Literature, Environmental & Sustainability Studies, and Women’s, Gender, & Sexuality Studies at UNC Greensboro. She feels fortunate to work with many students of color, first-generation students, and LGBTQI+ students at this Minority-Serving Institution. Their courage and imagination inspire her and give her hope. Her forthcoming book, winner of the 2021 Winter Goose Poetry Prize, is titled The Art of Restoration.

Photograph by OwlPacino via a Creative Commons license.


A note from Writers Resist:

Thank you for reading! If you appreciate creative resistance and would like to support it, you can make a small, medium or large donation to Writers Resist from our Give a Sawbuck page.

After the Splat

By Kate LaDew

 

In 1867, the first instance of a hero saving their sweetheart from an oncoming train after a dastardly villain tied them to the tracks debuted in the last scene of a New York stage play.

The hero’s sweetheart calls for help, while the hero, locked inside the train station, watches from a barred window, searching for a way out. The villain disappears, off to be dastardly somewhere else, and the whistle of a locomotive sounds, the sweetheart’s cries grow frantic.

The door shudders from a blow on the other side. The hinges creak, the wood splinters and the door swings open, lock dangling, as the hero appears, out of breath, axe in hand.

The sweetheart calls again, beginning to sob, as the hero rushes forward, tearing at the ropes crisscrossed over the tracks, and pulls the sweetheart to safety a split second before the train barrels past.

The woman drops the axe, the man shrugs off the remnants of the rope and they embrace, each declaring undying love. The sweetheart marvels that his hero is capable of such bravery, yet not allowed the right to vote.

In 1867, the first instance of a hero saving their sweetheart from an oncoming train after a dastardly villain tied them to the tracks features the woman as hero, the man as sweetheart.

A scene from Augustin Daly’s 1867 play, Under the Gaslight

Every moment since that night, men have waited while women, with incredible patience, undo the cruel, illogical and sometimes just plain stupid acts of other men. The good, waiting men all the while wondering why the world is so unfair and “Oh! if only something could be done, by somebody, somewhere, about it all.” But it can’t be them, The Good Men, because someone has tied them to a train track, and don’t you hear the whistle? and won’t somebody think about them? down here all alone with all the other Good Men, waiting for somebody, somewhere to do something about it all? Never mind how they got here, and never mind that the ropes aren’t secure because the knots have been tied by The Bad Men, who only know how to tie women’s wrists.

Those Brave Strong Women who really deserve more, more pay and medical rights and safety and equal access and equality in general and all those things they blabber on about. Someday maybe, somebody, but right now, let’s deal with the train situation.

All The Good Men who have daughters and wives and sisters and mothers and really get it, truly, no really, feminism and such, and hey, where are you going? don’t you hear?—can’t you see?—I would do something, I swear, it’s just, these ropes, you know and I mean, I don’t agree with all the bad men, and I’m only laughing to fit in, and I don’t really believe—and if it were up to me—and I would never—and the light in that tunnel’s pretty bright, and the tracks are really rumbling, aren’t they? and is it just me or is it getting hotter, and that whistle’s pretty close, and I think that might be the tr—

After the splat, the woman sitting in the train station she built from scratch, feet on the desk she designed herself, pauses in the middle of a sentence in the paragraph of a chapter of a book she wrote. Looking up at the blue cloudless sky, past the glass skylight she can open whenever she wants, the woman asks all the other women in the room, feet up on their own desks, reading their own self-authored books, Hey, did you hear something?

 


Kate LaDew is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Greensboro with a BA in Studio Art. She resides in Graham, North Carolina, with her cats Charlie Chaplin and Janis Joplin.

Boris Badenov image: Fair use.

Train scene from Daly’s Under the Gaslight (1868).